Neonatal/Infant Resuscitation
Neonatal/Infant Resuscitation 2
Brenda Hiu Yan H. Law, MD, MSc (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor
University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Study occurred from October 2020 to December 2021. We obtained data from 79 resuscitations, 48 in Phase 1, 31 in Phase 2. Thirty-five team leaders provided data for Phase 1, 24 for Phase 2, and 16 for both. Infants were median of 28 weeks, birth weight of 1110g. Most had mask ventilation (86%). Infant characteristics were similar between groups.(Table 1)
When data was available (n=16), the first resuscitation reported by each team leader for each phase were compared using paired analysis. There were no differences in any NASA-TLX domain or total score. All team leader responses were also compared, assuming independence. No difference in any NASA-TLX domain or total NASA-TLX were found with RFM use.(Table 1)
Using regression, the effect of RFM use, gestation, birth weight, maximum FiO2, and team leader years of experience on NASA-TLX was evaluated. Max FiO2 corresponded to higher scores in all domains while years of experience affected performance and effort. Max FiO2 and years of experience together explained 22% of variations in total NASA-TLX (F(1,71)=9.8, p=0.039). Each 10% increase in max FiO2 is associated with a total NASA-TLX increase of 2.5. Each year of experience resulted in an increase total NASA-TLX of 0.5.
Conclusion(s): Team leaders did not report increased workload with RFM use during delivery room resuscitation of very preterm infants. Workload was most influenced by patient acuity and HCP experience.