Neonatal Pulmonology
Neonatal Pulmonology 2: BPD Clinical
Kent A. Willis, MD (he/him/his)
Assistant Professor
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
To test if the composition of the intestinal mycobiome predicts the risk to develop BPD in very low birthweight infants.
We performed a prospective, observational cohort study to evaluate the fecal microbiota of very low birthweight infants (< 1500 g, n = 147). This study compared infants with BPD or the post-prematurity respiratory disease (PPRD), which encompasses none to mild BPD, by bacterial 16S and fungal ITS2 ribosomal RNA sequencing. To test the potential causative relationship between gut dysbiosis and BPD, we used fecal microbiota transplant in an antibiotic-pseudohumanized mouse model. We present one of the first reports of the multikingdom microbiome in premature neonates. Our results from a human cohort and mouse model suggest differences in the intestinal mycobiome may precede and anticipate the eventual development of BPD. Examining the multikingdom microbiome may be important to understand how the gut-lung axis impacts respiratory disease.
Results: From the 100 infants from which gut microbiome samples were successfully sequenced, 65 eventually developed PPRD, 37 BPD, and 7 died prior to adjudication. Infants that developed BPD showed a clear fungal dysbiosis as compared to infants with PPRD (p = 0.0451, Shannon Diversity, p = 0.0113, Chao1, Fig. 1A, p = 0.0219, PERMANOVA, Fig. 1B), that was more pronounced than differences identified in the multikingdom microbiome (p = 0.4, Shannon Diversity, p = Chao1, Fig. 1C, and p = 0.0229, PERMANOVA, Fig. 1D. Differential fungal and bacterial genera with FDR < 0.05 by negative binomial regression are shown in Fig. 1E). Experimentally, on successful colonization in mice, the gut microbiota from infants with BPD augmented lung injury in the offspring of recipient animals; altering both lung structure (p < 0.0001, ANOVA mean linear intercept and p < 0.001, ANOVA, radial alveolar counts) and function (p = 0.01, ANOVA, resistance; p = 0.008, ANOVA, compliance) as compared to PPRD-colonized mice.
Conclusion(s):