Neonatal Respiratory Assessment/Support/Ventilation
Neonatal Respiratory Assessment/Support/Ventilation 5: Surfactant and NIV 2
Lisa Lavelanet, MD (she/her/hers)
Pediatric Resident
NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital
New York, New York, United States
A total of 416 infants met the inclusion criteria (360 in Group-I and 56 in Group-II). On univariate analysis, infants in Group-II were born at lower GA (27.3±2.6 vs 29.8±2.2; p< 0.0001), weighed less at birth (998±412 vs 1356±440 g; p< 0.0001), and received higher rates of exogenous surfactant (35.8 vs 18.8%; p< 0.005) and caffeine therapy (49.0 vs 30.5%; p=0.01). The incidence of BPD (7.9 vs 32.1%), postnatal steroid use (1.4 vs 18.9%), O2@DC, (2.0 vs 11.3%), number of ventilator days, LOH, PMA at discharge, and several neonatal comorbidities were significantly lower in Group-I compared with Group-II (Table 1). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that HFNC use doubled the odds of BPD or death (p=0.049) and O2@DC (not significant) (Table 2), and increased the LOH by 15% (Relative risk=1.157 [1.00, 1.34], p=0.049).